Mining Investment in Chile, Argentina, and Peru 2025: Strategic Comparison for Investors

In 2025, Chile, Argentina, and Peru present compelling mining investment opportunities, with project portfolios of $83.18B (Chile), $17.9B (Argentina, potential 2026-2028), and $53.7B (Peru). These investments are primarily driven by copper, lithium, gold, and iron, yet each country faces unique challenges (CochilcoChile Cochilco , Argentina.gob.ar, Ministerio de Energía y Minas, 2025).

  • Chile leads with political stability and competitive costs ($1.90/lb copper) but has long permit times (7-11 years).
  • Argentina attracts investors with RIGI (30-year fiscal stability, 25% corporate tax) but struggles with foreign exchange controls and permitting delays (5-10 years).
  • Peru offers low production costs ($1.50-$1.70/lb copper) but is hindered by social conflicts and lengthy permitting (5-12 years).

Tax Incentives & Fiscal Stability

Chile (2025): Progressive mining royalty (0.5%-14%), R&D credits (35%-65%), and 10-15 years of fiscal stability. Investment focus: $15B in copper and $10B in lithium(Cochilco, InvestChile, 2025).

Strengths: Political stability since 2003, attractive for ESG-focused investors.

Weaknesses: Higher royalties increase costs; permitting takes 7-11 years.

Argentina (2025): RIGI (2024) offers 30-year fiscal stability, 25% corporate tax, VAT/export exemptions after 2-3 years, and foreign exchange flexibility after 4 years. Expected $15B in copper/lithium, but currency controls are a concern (Argentina.gob.ar, Bloomberg News, 2025).

Strengths: Attractive incentives, strategic copper/lithium potential.

Weaknesses: Political instability (Milei, 2027 elections), foreign exchange controls, permitting 5-10 years.

Peru (2025): Tax stability (20-30%), VAT exemptions, and R&D credits (up to 65%). Expected $6B-$8B in copper, gold, and lithium, but social conflicts slow progress (InvestPerú, Minem, 2025).

Strengths: Lowest copper costs ($1.50-$1.70/lb), rich reserves.

Weaknesses: Political volatility (2026 elections), social conflicts, permitting 5-12 years.


Operational Costs & Competitiveness

Chile: $1.90/lb copper (second quartile globally), high permitting times (7-11 years) increase CAPEX (S&P Global, 2025).

  • Key projects: Escondida ($7B), Nueva Centinela ($4.4B), Codelco ($8.5B).

Argentina: $2.10/lb copper, high costs due to currency controls and permitting delays (5-10 years)(S&P Global, 2025).

  • Key projects: Los Azules (McEwen, $2.7B), Mariana (Ganfeng, $980M).

Peru: $1.50-$1.70/lb copper, lowest in South America, but social conflicts and permitting delays (5-12 years) raise CAPEX(S&P Global, 2025).

  • Key projects: Quellaveco ($5.3B), Toromocho ($1.3B), San Gabriel ($1.2B).

Permitting & Regulatory Delays

Chile: 7-year average, up to 11 years for complex projects (copper/lithium). Environmental regulations (DS 40, SEIA) and community consultationsslow progress (Cochilco, 2025).

  • Projects like Los Bronces and El Morro face environmental opposition, delaying $15B in investments (Cochilco, 2025).

Argentina: 5-10 years due to provincial regulations, environmental approvals, and foreign exchange controls (Argentina.gob.ar, 2025).

  • Projects like Los Azules and Mariana might face delays, impacting $17.9B in potential investments (Bloomberg, 2025).

Peru: 5-8 years on average, up to 12 years for complex copper/gold projects, due to environmental laws (DS 017-2020) and community resistance(Minem, 2025).

  1. Projects like Conga and Tía María face social conflicts, delaying $20B (Minem, 2025).

Political Stability & Social Risks

Chile: Stable since 2003, with municipal elections in 2025 and fiscal predictability, but ESG regulations add permitting challenges(El País Chile, 2025).

  • Judicial cases impact major projects like Dominga (Cochilco, 2025).

Argentina: Unstable under Milei (2023-2025), 2027 elections could impact RIGI, and foreign exchange controls since 2011 create uncertainty (Argentina.gob.ar, 2025).

  • High risks due to regulatory uncertainty, affecting projects like Los Azules (Bloomberg, 2025).

Peru: Volatile since 2021, frequent leadership changes, 2026 elections bring uncertainty (BCRP, 2025).

  • Social conflicts in Cajamarca, Áncash, and Arequipa delay $20B in projects (Minem, 2025).

Strategic Investment Opportunities (2025-2030)

  • Chile: $15B in copper (Escondida, Nueva Centinela) and $10B in lithium (Codelco-SQM, CEOL), if permitting accelerates and ESG rules remain stable (Cochilco, 2025).
  • Argentina: $15B in copper/lithium (Los Azules, Mariana), if currency controls are eased and permitting improves (Argentina.gob.ar, 2025).
  • Peru: $6B-$8B in copper/gold/lithium (Quellaveco, Toromocho), if social conflicts and permitting hurdles are resolved (Minem, 2025).

Investor Recommendations

Chile: Prioritize stability and ESG appeal, but be prepared for long permitting (7-11 years).

Argentina: Consider RIGI’s tax incentives and lithium/copper potential, but monitor currency controls and political shifts.

Peru: Leverage low costs ($1.50-$1.70/lb copper), but manage social risks and permitting delays (5-12 years).

Diversification is key to mitigating regulatory, political, and social risks (S&P Global, 2025).


Where to Invest in 2025?

Chile, Argentina, and Peru each offer unique mining opportunities in 2025.

  • Chile leads in stability 🏛️
  • Peru wins on low production costs 📉
  • Argentina shines with strong investment incentives 💰

But permitting delays (7-12 years), political shifts, and social conflicts will shape the fate of $46B-$48B in total investments from 2025-2030.

Compartir nota:
Twitter
LinkedIn
WhatsApp
Facebook

Contenido exclusivo para socios

¿Todavía no sos socio?